Delivery Unit Adjustment Stabilization
A comprehensive case study demonstrating how I-MR control charts, regression analysis, and FMEA prioritization stabilized a chaotic DU request workflow, eliminating bottlenecks through user-behavior targeting and intelligent duplicate detection.
Project Overview
Statistical Workflow Stabilization
The Challenge
Corporate operations inundated with DU (Delivery Unit) change requests exhibiting extreme variation (CV=52%). Different submitters creating bottlenecks, duplicate submissions (~18%), incorrect routing (~22%) causing QA rework and workflow delays. Process exhibited no predictability or stability.
The Methodology
30-day I-MR control chart identifying user-specific variation patterns (Day 20 spike: submitter #7 generated 12 reqs), regression analysis proving duplicates explain 93% of rework (R²=0.93, 2.1 hours per duplicate), and FMEA ranking incorrect routing (RPN=504) as critical failure mode.
The Implementation
Deployed standardized routing logic addressing FMEA highest-risk mode, intelligent duplicate detection system eliminating submission redundancy, and enhanced SOP with focused training targeting user-behavior KPIVs identified through I-MR chart analysis.
The Results
85% variation reduction (CV: 52% → 8%), duplicate reduction from 18% to 1.1% (-94%), routing error reduction from 22% to 2.4% (-89%), QA time -65%, SLA improvement 85% → 96%, workflow predictability achieved with replication opportunity across 6 business units (~156 QA hours/year freed).
Interactive Presentation
Explore the Full Case Study
Delivery Unit Adjustment Case Study
Learning Outcomes
Key Takeaways for Process Improvement Practitioners
I-MR Charts Reveal User-Behavior Variation
Control chart spike analysis identified submitter #7 as variation source (12 requests on Day 20), proving user behavior—not process design—was primary KPIV. Targeted training yielded 87% compliance improvement.
Regression Quantifies Impact of Duplicates
Model (R²=0.93) quantified each duplicate at 2.1 hours rework (p<0.001), explaining 93% of workflow variation. This objective evidence drove automation investment and duplicate detection system deployment.
FMEA Prioritizes Solutions Correctly
Routing errors (RPN=504) ranked as critical, validating why standardized routing logic was first solution deployed. Combined with regression insights, two-pronged approach addressed both high-impact failure modes.
Coefficient of Variation Tracks Stability
85% reduction in CV (52% → 8%) demonstrated transformation from chaotic to predictable workflow. Metric-driven approach shifted focus from anecdotal complaints to statistical reality.
Transactional Process Improvement is Replicable
I-MR chart → regression → FMEA → targeted solutions framework successfully applied to one corporate operation. Framework replicable across 6 business units with projected 45% duplicate reduction enterprise-wide.
Sustainability Through SOP & Monitoring
Enhanced SOP documentation, focused user training, and ongoing I-MR monitoring ensure long-term stability. Enterprise-wide capacity savings of ~156 QA hours/year enables strategic initiatives rather than rework.
Download the Complete Case Study
Get instant access to the full presentation with detailed I-MR analysis, regression modeling, FMEA findings, and implementation roadmap.
📥 Download Case Study (.PDF) View More Case StudiesReady to Master Six Sigma?
Join thousands of professionals who have earned their Six Sigma certification with Six Sigma Development Solutions Inc.
✓ Explore Training Programs